|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| The whole study involves two phases and takes 60 days to complete. The first phase is in the form of interactional observation and the second phase is in the form of quasi experimental study with the design of groups similar to pre-test and post-test. Three groups of the AFP (Additional Food Plan) students had treatment and one group of students was without AFP as a controlled group. The treatment given are in the form of food which cost RM 1.80 (G1), RM2.30 (G2) and RM 2.80 (G3) respectively. Every group consists of 6 students from primary 1 until primary 6. This study is aimed to analyze the cost effectiveness of food in the Additional Food Plan. The analysis from the coupled t-test evaluated on one aspect of cognitive domain (academic achievement) and eight aspects of affective domain shows that the mean of the group of students without the AFP is higher compared to the students treated with the AFP. However from the aspects of achievement increase the AFP students showed greater increase. The analysis of the comparison of the food cost of AFP/SMP discovered that students of AFP (G2) who are allocated RM 2.30 for an individual meal recorded the highest Index Value that is 5.69 compared to the other given treatment and also the controlled group. Thus with the cost of RM 2.30 the treatment is able to provide the best effect for the students in improving academic achievement, learning process and self-management. Thus, the impact of the AFP program is significant in generating high quality student human capital for the nation. |
| References |
1. Hatloy, A., Torheim, L., & Oshaug, A. (1998). Food variety Ð a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,52, 891-8. 2. Malaysia, Ministry of Education. (1996). Education Policy Planning and Research Division. Additional Food Plan. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education. 3. Malaysia, Ministry of Education. (1991). Education Policy Planning and Research Division. Additional Food Plan. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education. 4. Malaysia, Ministry of Education. (2006). MOE Education Policy Planning and Research Division. Evaluation Study on the Additional Food Plan Aid Program/School Milk Program. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education. 5. National Health and Medical Research Council, (2013). Australian Dietary Guidelines,Commonwealth of Australia. 6. Reicks M, Trofholz AC, Stang JS, Laska MN. (2014). Impact of cooking and home food preparation interventions among adults: outcomes and implications for future programs. Journal of Nutr Educ Behav. 46:259–76. 7. Tee, E. S. (1979). Nutrition of School Children and Snack Foods Sold in Canteens. Paper presented at Conference on Health, Food and Nutrition, 1979 September 15- 20, Penang, Malaysia. 8. World Health Organization, (1999). Improving Health Through Schools: National and International Strategies, WHO Information Series on School Health. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |